Containerized Energy System

Design basis: general arrangement dated 12 July 2022. Dimensions describe the container, not the complete canopy footprint.

• 

  25° concept arrangement

  The early concept sheet sets out a 70-module solar plane above the container and establishes the overall envelope and support positions

• 

  10° general arrangement

  The later general arrangement records a split array of 40 and 30 modules and connects the external form to the internal container layout

• 

  Rafters, purlins and bracing

  The underside view exposes the member arrangement beneath the modules. Repeated rafters and purlins support the solar plane, while diagonal members connect the outer edges to the main structure

• 

  Container and support interfaces

  The end view makes the canopy overhang and bracing geometry clear. Pivot blocks, column bases and ISO corner-casting connections appear as specific interfaces in the structural analysis

An assembly of defined interfaces

Member geometry, attachment locations and connection details were developed together. The analysis then examined the overall frame and the local regions where forces pass between parts

• 

  Exhaust duct assembly

  The duct drawing defines the route, branches, supports and local connection details. Its position links the battery and inverter zones to the exhaust path

• 

  Cable duct assembly

  The cable duct drawing establishes a separate service route within the container. This helps coordinate electrical connections with doors, partitions and equipment mounting

The internal assembly brings these details together with the main door, mesh doors, air-conditioning outdoor unit and panel rack. Together, these interfaces define the detailed container assembly

• 

  Mesh and member arrangement

  The finite element model represents the solar-support frame and its connection regions. Local mesh views resolve the joints used to transfer forces between members

• 

  Wind-load application

  The report combines self-weight with wind loading. Its module basis is 70 panels at 35 kg each, with a specified wind pressure of 1,500 Pa per panel

• 

  Connection-level representation

  The local mesh shows the bracing and connection plates at a joint, supporting closer review of force transfer and concentrated stress

• 

  Model restraints

  The restraint view identifies the fixed locations used in this analysis. Interpretation of the results depends on these support assumptions

Revised FEA material basis: steel density 7,850 kg/m³, elastic modulus 200 GPa, Poisson ratio 0.29 and yield strength 240 MPa

• 

  44.5 mm reported purlin deformation

  The revised report identifies the purlin as the location of maximum deformation. The contour shows where the frame is most flexible under the analysed load case

• 

  200 MPa displayed overall stress

  The overall stress view provides a first reading of the frame response. Separate local views reveal concentrations that need interpretation at the connection level

Quoted results are from the July 2022 revised-thickness report. They describe that model and load case; a deformation acceptance limit is not stated in the supplied report

• 

  Purlin bolt-hole region

  The report records a local peak of 318 MPa and discusses the influence of the washer. It uses 150 MPa as a representative value. This local peak requires joint-level interpretation

• 

  Corner-casting pivot

  The revised report records 77 MPa at the pivot fixed to the ISO corner casting. A separate pivot-block and column-base-plate assessment records 18 MPa

• 

  Rafter response

  The source describes a 220 MPa peak as a singularity and gives 170 MPa as the representative maximum for the rafter

• 

  Bracing and weld region

  The source gives 150 MPa as the representative bracing stress after discussing the peak at the gusset-to-column weld region

The reported interpretations are retained here as analysis findings. Local peaks, washer/contact effects and weld details need appropriate connection review before engineering acceptance

• 

  External flow domain

  The CFD model places the elevated container inside a full-scale external domain. The boundary-condition presentation specifies wind approaching from opposite the container door

• 

  Container and local mesh

  The mesh captures the surrounding air and the internal equipment arrangement. The proposed setup treats filters and mesh as porous regions based on their open area

These heat loads are modelling assumptions in the boundary-condition report. They are not product output ratings or verified operating efficiencies

• 

  Velocity in an internal section

  The velocity field helps identify the main flow path and regions with less air movement around the equipment

• 

  Temperature in the same section

  The temperature field connects the airflow pattern to local heating. The source legend spans 45–55°C in this plotted plane

Original simulation plots retain their legends. Different figures use different ranges, so colours should be interpreted within each plot

• 

  Battery surfaces

  The battery contours show an uneven temperature distribution across the four racks. Area-weighted averages in the result file range from 58.0°C to 72.3°C

• 

  Electrical panel surfaces

  The component plots highlight concentrated heating on the electrical panels. The result file reports a 90.2°C area-weighted average for the ACDB surface

Source: CASE-1 / Temp values.txt. Values rounded to one decimal. Surface averages are distinct from room-air averages and local contour maxima

The archive contains successive revisions. Drawing selection and issue status should follow the project document register when the package is used for manufacturing