Skip to content
Close-up render of the perforated conical strainer screen

16 Inch Conical Strainer

Understanding pressure loss and flow

Product Design & Development

16-Inch Conical Strainer

Nominal strainer size
16 inch
Reported CFD mesh cells
15 million
Reported pressure drop
18.74 kPa

The Analysis Process

How we assessed the strainer flow

  1. 01 Strainer Geometry

    Dimensioned drawing of the 16-inch conical strainer, tag SPS-230101

    Source drawing for strainer tag SPS-230101

    We used the supplied geometry to define the cone and its position in the housing. The drawing establishes the strainer dimensions and perforated construction.

  2. 02 CFD Domain and Mesh

    CFD flow domain of the pipe run and strainer branch

    CFD model view. Reported mesh: 15 million cells

    We modelled the pipe and strainer flow domain. The report specifies a pipe length of 4.5 m and a CFD mesh of 15 million cells

  3. 03 Screen Resistance Inputs

    Model detail of the conical screen at the branch junction

    Model detail at the cone and branch junction

    The case combines 66.78% perforated-sheet open area with 48.5% open area for mesh code 40. The resulting cumulative open area is 32.39%

  4. 04 Operating Conditions

    Operating conditions: process gas, mass flow rate 256,327 kg/h, fluid density 44.68 kg/m³, viscosity 0.0124 cP, process pressure 3,880 kPa, temperature 41 °C

    Inputs documented in the CFD report and workbook

    We applied the documented fluid properties and operating inputs to evaluate pressure loss and visualise flow through the strainer assembly.

Pressure and Velocity Results

The pressure loss and local flow pattern

  • Pressure contour through the strainer and branch on Plane-01

    Pressure Distribution

    Original pressure contour on Plane-01

    The report records a pressure drop of 18.74 kPa for the selected screen configuration. The contour shows the pressure change through the strainer and branch.

    18.74 kPa reported pressure drop

  • Velocity contour through the strainer and branch on Plane-01

    Velocity Distribution

    Original velocity contour on Plane-01

    The contour shows local acceleration as flow turns into the outlet branch, with lower-velocity regions around the cone tip. It reveals an uneven flow distribution.

    Local acceleration near the branch

Pressure drop follows the report and workbook. The archived pressure-plot values differ from the stated process pressure. The reference offset is not documented.

Flow Through the Cone and Outlet

Streamlines reveal the internal flow path

Velocity-coloured streamlines through the conical screen and up the vertical outlet
Velocity-coloured streamlines on Plane-01 The streamlines show the inlet flow passing through the conical screen and turning towards the vertical outlet. Curved paths around the cone tip make local recirculation visible in the reported flow field
Outcome

A quantified pressure-loss basis

The study established a reported pressure drop of 18.74 kPa for the documented case. The pressure and velocity views explain how flow redistributes through the strainer, giving the client a loss estimate and visual evidence for design review

  • Industry Proven Frameworks
  • Get consultancy-level insights

Explore Detailed Case Study

Request a Quote

Tell us about your project

Fields marked * are required.

Choose a file (optional)

Drawings, CAD, images or ZIP (.pdf, .png, .jpg, .jpeg, .dwg, .dxf, .step, .stp, .iges, .igs, .stl, .zip), up to 15 MB.